Skip to main content

Situation and Audience Analysis Reflection

I found our first assignment, the situation and audience analysis, to be a thorough way to better understand the primary audience’s needs and how to best tailor communication strategies to specific groups. Our group chose to tackle the incidence of preventable HPV-caused oropharyngeal cancer in 18- to 26-year-old men who have sex with men (MSM) in Harlem. Our communication plan aimed to promote the HPV vaccine and other preventive measures among our primary audience. HPV prevention in men is rarely discussed within the public, so i have learned a lot over the course of this project.  

     A challenge we faced was narrowing down our audience enough to make our project impactful. Because adolescent girls and young women are heavily encouraged to get the Gardasil vaccine and get screened for cervical cancer, we knew we wanted to focus on men, a less targeted population. Because there has been little research done in HPV among men, we had to get creative in how we narrowed our primary audience. Key informant interviews helped immensely in this process, as they provided us with information that is not widely published in the literature. After completing our interviews, we decided to focus on unvaccinated MSM aged 18- to 26-years-old in Harlem.

    Another challenge we experienced was choosing who our secondary audiences would be. Both of our interviews were with people in healthcare and academia, which was incredibly helpful. However, they did not have the lived experience of someone in the primary audience. Due to time constraints, we were unable to speak with someone in our primary audience. I think this would have been beneficial in selecting our secondary audiences, as the primary audience can speak to who they interact with most and how these stakeholders influence (or do not influence) their actions. For example, we originally planned to include family members as a secondary audience. However, after speaking with Dr. Schiavo and conducting key informant interviews, we realized young adult men likely would not discuss sexual health, sexually transmitted infection, and preventive measures with their families. With this feedback, we opted to include sexual partners, medical care providers in urgent care and sexual health clinics, and pharmacists as our secondary audiences. 

    I was struck by how much this part of the project laid the foundation for the rest of the project. Having a comprehensive understanding of the audiences you are communicating with and where they are situated plays a vital role and how well the rest of the health communication plan is executed. 


[Posted by Morgan Parker]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Incorporating Pharmacists into the HPVAX Action Plan

    Throughout the course of this project, my group and I have discovered that local pharmacists can play an important role in HPV vaccine uptake among harder to reach community members. Compared to primary care providers, pharmacists tend to be more accessible, have extended hours, and walk-in options. Pharmacies are typically situated more conveniently in communities that major health centers, as well. Additionally, Gov. Hochul recently signed legislation allowing pharmacists to administer HPV vaccines. The combination of these factors widens the opportunity for vaccination uptake among our primary audience: young adult MSM in Harlem.      In the action plan, we honed in on how to best raise awareness among pharmacists about the need for increased vaccination among MSM in Harlem. One tactic we came up with is called "Data Bites: A Lunch & Learn Series." This monthly series will allow local pharmacists and physicians to get to know one another and disc...

Let’s Talk About Sex: Part 2

  When our group had initially discussed our idea for the communications campaign, we wanted to target heterosexual men 18-26 in Harlem to get the HPV vaccine. After doing some research, we saw that there was a high need for specifically the men who have sex with men (MSM) group and so we narrowed our population down. Reflecting back, I am interested how our campaign would’ve differed had our target group been more broadly men 18-26 in Harlem. What would’ve been the key differences in our objectives, strategies and tactics? The research shows that the MSM population is more likely than heterosexual males to not use protection during sex and in turn have a higher STI rate. Interestingly, they are more likely to be trust healthcare professionals and be open to getting the HPV vaccine. Thus, for our campaign we focused heavily on behavioral changes around utilizing safe sex practices and on increasing knowledge and awareness around the risks of HPV and the vaccine.   Given the ...

Let's Talk About Sex

We have now gotten to the action (tactical) plan phase of this project. The action plan is when you get to take all your research, planning and objective and come up with an actionable, feasible and strategic plan for all of the communication messages, materials, activities, channels and so on that you would like to use on the key audiences for your communications program. For our communications program HPVAX we are looking to build awareness and increase the number of men who have sex with men (MSM) in Harlem to get the HPV vaccines and have protected sex to diminish the spread of HPV and oral cancers. One of the key secondary groups we want to target with our program are sexual partners. Sexual partners are such an important group to target for this program as they have such an influence on the primary group- 18–26-year-old MSM in Harlem. Research shows that MSM perceptions of condom use are primarily shaped by social norms and their interactions with sexual partners. If sexual partn...